Skip to main content

View related sites

  • Thought leadership
  • Media
  • Newsletter
  • FAQ
  • Events
  • Contact us
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

Cambridge Mathematics

  • About us
  • The Cambridge Mathematics Framework
  • Our services
  • For teachers and practitioners
  • Blogs
  • Research
  • Thought leadership
  • Media
  • Newsletter
  • FAQ
  • Contact us

Designing twin-fographics

  • Cambridge Mathematics
  • Mathematical Salad
  • Designing twin-fographics
  • Blogs
  • Teaching maths
  • Considering the research
  • Interviews and intersections
  • Mining for maths
  • Events and take-aways
  • Policy and big ideas

Designing twin-fographics

by Darren Macey, 30 April 2024
Two Baby Sisters Crawling on a White Seamless, With One Being in Focus and the Other Out of Focus

Have you ever considered what the best choice of numbers is to communicate an idea? Or why always following a hard and fast rule might end up being confusing? I recently came across an infographic that got me thinking about how important it is to choose carefully when to follow a rule, and when to go for something a little more … bespoke!

A very common approach when trying to communicate prevalence or risk is to express the quantity as a proportion. Often, a percentage is used, or the more general idea of ‘so many out of one hundred’. This leads to a very useful visual representation sometimes called a ‘waffle diagram’ – a one hundred grid colour coded to show proportional information. These can be useful to make comparisons of absolute and relative risks; for example, in this task from NRICH that explores the health risk of eating processed meats: How Risky is My Diet?

A chalkboard with 100 drawn stick figures of which 5 are coloured blue and also outlined with a blue circle

Adapted with permission of NRICH, University of Cambridge, from video 4 'How risky is my diet’ (2020).

Recently, when discussing my partner’s work as a midwife, we looked at a diagram together that represents the frequency of twin births in the population of the UK and noticed something very odd. The proportion was given not as a number out of 100, but out of 64, which got us thinking: Why the odd choice of numbers?

Infographic showing ‘2 in every 64 babies are twins’ with icons of 62 single babies and a pair of twins

Used with permission from Gallimore I, Evans T, Kurinczuk J, Kenyon S, Draper E, on behalf of the MBRRACE-UK Collaboration, “Learning from deaths in twin pregnancies”, Leicester: The Infant Mortality and Morbidity Studies, Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Leicester, 2021.

In percentage terms, this represents 3.125% or 3.125 babies in every 100 that are twins. Clearly it makes sense to avoid using this decimal figure in relation to the very discrete quantitative unit of 'a human child' and so x out of 100 is no use. But why 2 in 64 rather than the perhaps more obvious choice of 1 in 32?

As a mathematician, I immediately focused in on the relationship between 2 and 64 as a power of two, and wondered whether this had some significance. It turned out that the number 2 was important but not in the way I thought – my partner observed the far more relevant feature of the piece of information here … twins come in pairs!

In fact, if you consider the information diagrammatically it becomes obvious that presenting the data as 1 in 32 would result in a far more abstract diagram, because only one of the twin babies would be visible. And there may be an uncomfortable implication that a further 31 births would need to take place before the second of the twins emerges noisily into the world, no doubt wondering what was the delay and can I please have some milk now!

Even so, with the more natural choice of 2 in 64, it still requires some stylistic flourishes to communicate the difference between the purple icons, each representing a single child born to a different parent, and the blue icon representing the twin birth with the twins visibly squooshed together, potentially representing the unfathomable urge to dress them up in creepily similar clothing.

This is a great example of where knowing the context of numbers leads to different decisions about how the quantities are expressed and the related stylistic choices that best communicate graphically the underlying message.

What do you think? Does the choice of 2 in 64 births make the prevalence of twins easier to understand? Do you have any alternative suggestion that would communicate the twin birthrate in the UK better? And can you think of other situations where the context dictates that a more effective representation than x out of 100 could be chosen? Let us know in the comments below.

Useful links

  • Home
  • About us
  • The Cambridge Mathematics Framework
  • Services
  • For teachers & practitioners
  • Blogs
  • Research
  • Thought leadership
  • Media
  • Newsletter
  • FAQ
  • Contact us

About Cambridge Mathematics

Cambridge Mathematics is committed to championing and securing a world class mathematics education for all students from 3 – 19 years old, applicable to both national and international contexts and based on evidence from research and practice.

  • Cambridge Mathematics

View Related Sites

  • University of Cambridge
  • Cambridge University Press & Assessment
  • Faculty of Mathematics
  • Faculty of Education

© Cambridge University Press & Assessment 2025

  • Sitemap
  • Accessibility and Standards
  • Data Protection
  • Use of Cookies
  • Statement on Modern Slavery
  • Terms and Conditions
Back to top
We use cookies. By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to set cookies