Skip to main content

View related sites

  • Thought leadership
  • Media
  • Newsletter
  • FAQ
  • Events
  • Contact us
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

Cambridge Mathematics

  • About us
  • The Cambridge Mathematics Framework
  • Our services
  • For teachers and practitioners
  • Blogs
  • Research
  • Thought leadership
  • Media
  • Newsletter
  • FAQ
  • Contact us

Not imaginary numbers, but imaginary geometry

  • Cambridge Mathematics
  • Mathematical Salad
  • Not imaginary numbers, but imaginary geometry
  • Blogs
  • Teaching maths
  • Considering the research
  • Interviews and intersections
  • Mining for maths
  • Events and take-aways
  • Policy and big ideas

Not imaginary numbers, but imaginary geometry

by Rachael Horsman, 23 November 2016
Half of a man's face full on and also in profile

Intrigue and curiosity should be a part of everybody's learning. One way to engage with geometry is to consider Kanizsa figures., such as the one below (the Kanizsa triangle).

RR4 Box 0_1

Kanizsa figures challenge your perceptions, because you see what's not actually there but what's insinuated by the clever use of lines, contours and sometimes colour.

Italian psychologist Geatano Kanizsa first described this optical illusion in 1955 as a subjective or illusory contour illusion. The study of such optical illusions has led to an understanding of how the brain and eyes perceive optical information and has been used considerably by artists and designers alike. They show the power of human imagination in filling in the gaps to make implied constructions in our own minds.

Kanizsa figures and similar illusions are a really useful way to encourage learners to 'say what they see' and to explain how they see it. It offers a chance for others to become aware of the different views available in a diagram and share their own thoughts without the 'danger' of being wrong; many people see different things.

Visual perception is an integral part of learning and 'seeing' is " not a passive activity but involves active construction on the part of the viewer"1. Learning to 'see' in geometry involves discerning features, breaking down and building up geometrical figures, and identifying relationships, as well as articulating these ideas to others and communicating clear and concise descriptions, arguments and conjectures.

What better way to do this than with an optical illusion?

However, the ability to discern information from an incomplete picture is also a useful geometrical tool. A good starter for a lesson on this might ask: what shape are Mickey Mouse's ears? (we only ever see 2D representations from many angles…the inference is that they are spherical, as all the views give circular profiles!)

We can also consider the rings of Saturn. Since we know that Saturn has rings we can infer their 3D shape from a 2D photograph:

RR4 Box 0_1a

But go back in time and various drawing of Saturn show that previous astronomers were not quite so accurate. Galileo showed how mathematical understanding could be put to use in a creative way. He was the first astronomer to observe Saturn's rings, at first thinking they were moons on either side of the planet, causing him to describe the planet as 'triple-bodied'. This was his first guess at an image of Saturn:

RR4 Box 0_2

Imagine his astonishment when later he observed that the objects either side had disappeared - he wrote "I do not know what to say in a case so surprising, so unlooked for and so novel". He had, in fact, seen the rings edge-on from the Earth's perspective (called a ring plane crossing). Another, later, observation showed two half-ellipses. He now deduced something more like our own idea of Saturn today:

RR4 Box 0_3

What to conclude? What shape could these mysterious objects be? Were they solid?

It took several more astronomers, keenly observing and recording, before the true shape of the rings of Saturn were clearly understood. Because of the huge distance we are from Saturn and the complexity of its makeup, we are still refining and reviewing our ideas of its shape. For example, until 1980 it was thought that Saturn had exactly seven rings - now we know there are potentially hundreds: ringlets within rings. With partial information about shapes, we must use our mathematical understanding to scientifically estimate the best guess we can make that fits the known facts - and this is liable to change as we get new information.

Similarly, Friedrich August Kekule dreamed that the benzene molecule was a hexagonal ring in 1850, a fact that was accepted but not actually seen until the 1980s.

So sharing optical illusions will benefit your pupils' confidence, ability to use their imagination, explain their ideas and possible even more! Do share any good ones that you have come across with us here at Cambridge Mathematics.

1. Johnston-Wilder, J. and Mason, J. Developing Thinking in Geometry (2005), Open University

SOMETHING TO TRY:

What can you see?

RR4 Box 1

(images from here and here)

How many triangles can you find?

RR4 Box 2

Useful links

  • Home
  • About us
  • The Cambridge Mathematics Framework
  • Services
  • For teachers & practitioners
  • Blogs
  • Research
  • Thought leadership
  • Media
  • Newsletter
  • FAQ
  • Contact us

About Cambridge Mathematics

Cambridge Mathematics is committed to championing and securing a world class mathematics education for all students from 3 – 19 years old, applicable to both national and international contexts and based on evidence from research and practice.

  • Cambridge Mathematics

View Related Sites

  • University of Cambridge
  • Cambridge University Press & Assessment
  • Faculty of Mathematics
  • Faculty of Education

© Cambridge University Press & Assessment 2025

  • Sitemap
  • Accessibility and Standards
  • Data Protection
  • Use of Cookies
  • Statement on Modern Slavery
  • Terms and Conditions
Back to top
We use cookies. By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to set cookies